Hey everyone,
It’s been a very long time since I wrote here,
yet earlier this month, someone still found this blog and contacted me about it. As today marks
the three year anniversary of me leaving EUROCONTROL, I thought it was a proper
time to write one final blog, to share what I've been doing, what I've learned and answer the frequently asked questions I've been getting the past years.
So, as you just read and as was expected after
my review board, the decision to end my training was not overruled by higher
management and my contract was indeed terminated. The main reason behind this
decision was that I failed to be a good trainee, who followed the procedures as
laid down by the IANS and build proper safety buffers into his work
accordingly. (more on this later in this blog)
These are basic skills required to make it to
the end, and despite a very noticeable improvement over the last few weeks of
my training, I was unable to recover completely. As a result, the risk of me
slowing down, and possibly compromising, the rest of the group’s development
was too high and no chances could be taken.
The question I heard most throughout the past
years was without a doubt if I could still apply somewhere else. The answer to
that question is: I can, but it depends on the ANSP.
After I was sent home, I contacted several
other ANSP’s with the question if I could or could not apply with their company
and go through their selection process. I haven’t done a check-up now, so some
of these may already be dated by now, but in alphabetical order, these are the
answers I received:
Belgocontrol (Belgium): YES
è As far as I understood, this had
something to do with anti-discrimination laws that prohibit withholding me from
participating in the selection procedure because of previous results.
Belgian Air Component: YES
è Civil and military ATC are
completely different, meaning they hardly have a connection to each other in
terms of training success rates.
DFS (Germany): NO
è EUROCONTROL’s training course is
very similar to that of DFS, so failing in either one of them, will most likely
result in failing the other as well.
ENAC (France): NO
è As far as I can remember, in order
to apply with ENAC, you need to be a French citizen, and have passed several
high-level mathematical courses. Perfect knowledge of the French language is
also a prerequisite.
EUROCONTROL (supranational): NO
è Quite obvious why not, I suppose,
but added it here just to be complete.
LVNL (Netherlands): NO
è After requesting and analysing my
results with EUROCONTROL, LVNL decided they were not willing to take the risk
of allowing me to apply, only to fail mid-course again.
NATS (United Kingdom): YES
è NATS uses slightly different
procedures (CAA), so bad results in ICAO-training would not automatically imply
bad results in their training.
Skyguide (Switzerland): NO
è Like LVNL, this decision was made
based on my results with EUROCONTROL.
So, that leaves me with three options, if none changed
their recruitment procedures between then and now. While Belgocontrol just didn't
look for Ab Initios throughout the years, NATS has recruited several times but
I have never applied. I don’t know why exactly, but I always felt like
something was holding me back in actually taking the step to send in my
application.
What about the Belgian Air Component then… Have
I signed up with them? Yes, I have. Just yesterday actually, meaning I still
have all the selection tests ahead of me. So … Why only now, you’re probably
wondering?
To be perfectly honest, after getting the word
that my career at EUROCONTROL came to an end, I've been pretty deep. Don't worry, all is fine now and it wasn't to the
extent that I got into a depression or anything, but I did spend a lot of time
thinking of what to do with/in my future, as my dream had shattered into
pieces. At some point, I convinced myself that perhaps, it just wasn't meant to
be and tried to forget all about getting in somewhere.
Coincidentally, this was just around the time
my sister finished high school and started looking into university studies. The
day she went to enrol, I also decided to start a Bachelor’s degree in
Communication and Media Sciences, which is what I've been doing for nearly 2
years now. With that degree, I hoped to eventually get a job in the PR-department
of some (preferably aviation-related) company, or become a (writing) journalist.
I definitely find the course and its material very interesting, but from the get-go, I've felt it's not exactly what I really wanted to do, and with people still occasionally asking me if I
wouldn't like to get another chance, I always kept feeling that pull towards
the aviation sector. Add the fact that more and more people began pointing out I should do what
makes me happy, rather than what pays the bills, and I come back to my lifelong interest in and passion for
aviation, more particularly the military kind, which is where it all actually
started for me
So that's it, in a nutshell, a quick-forward to today, where I'm registered to take the selection tests to become either a:
- military pilot
- military air traffic controller (ATC) or assistant
- military air defence assistant (ADC)
I've applied for these four to keep all of my options open. After getting the results, I will see if and what I am allowed to choose from, and decide what my choice will be.
I've applied for these four to keep all of my options open. After getting the results, I will see if and what I am allowed to choose from, and decide what my choice will be.
But enough about me, as that's not the only - or even most important - thing I want to talk about. The main purpose of this blog has always been to inform you - the reader- and I have learned that there are serious pitfalls that need to be taken into account when considering a future in the aviation business.
After my contract with EUROCONTROL ended, I fell back upon the online network where I learned most about ATC: IVAO. With my real life experiences, I became Head of Training in the Belgian division almost instantly, but soon discovered that my newly created mindset did not work well with the general expectations and possibilities of the network. That's when I realized that IVAO has been both a blessing and a curse for me.
Thanks to IVAO, I have been able to discover the world of ATC, teaching me everything I needed to get into EUROCONTROL and make it as far as I did.
Due to IVAO, and especially its lack of guidance, however, I had taught myself a number of wrong procedures, which I had to unlearn in order to accomplish the procedures set out by the course, in particular the one at the IANS. My failure to do so in time, is a significant part of what eventually lead to the ending of my training.
Therefore, a VERY IMPORTANT WARNING TO ANY ASPIRING PILOT OR ATC out there:
Flight sims (any Microsoft Flight Simulator, X-Plane, Falcon-modification, DCS-module ...) and online networks (IVAO, VATSIM, ...) are nothing but a virtual experience. They CAN indeed be a great asset in your training, but ONLY when used properly and with expert guidance. ALWAYS keep in mind that it is not real life, even when the developers claim it to be very authentic and an exact copy of reality, and may therefore be entirely wrong.
This in turn leads me to a question I've been getting a lot: How much do you need to know about aviation to try for the selection tests or start the course. The answer is pretty simple: none is required, but having a base to build on does help to some extent. Some of my classmates had absolutely no experience with aviation at the start of the course, and they are now fully licensed air traffic controllers, so it's not impossible, but it will require dedication and persistence.
For me, as mentioned above, my base was formed by my early interest in aviation and my subsequent virtual experiences. Nevertheless, if you are planning to apply or start a course in the near future, I would suggest to stay away from flight sims and online networks until AFTER you've learned how to do it all properly. It's a lot easier to start with a blank sheet, than to have to erase and overwrite stuff.
This in turn leads me to a question I've been getting a lot: How much do you need to know about aviation to try for the selection tests or start the course. The answer is pretty simple: none is required, but having a base to build on does help to some extent. Some of my classmates had absolutely no experience with aviation at the start of the course, and they are now fully licensed air traffic controllers, so it's not impossible, but it will require dedication and persistence.
For me, as mentioned above, my base was formed by my early interest in aviation and my subsequent virtual experiences. Nevertheless, if you are planning to apply or start a course in the near future, I would suggest to stay away from flight sims and online networks until AFTER you've learned how to do it all properly. It's a lot easier to start with a blank sheet, than to have to erase and overwrite stuff.
Another important advice I'm forwarding here, for those that don't (always) check the comment section:
I'd like to give you some advices though for your next training, if you get in somewhere, and of course if you're interested.Keep a low profile, don't write a blog about everything - it will come out sooner or later and during training the only reason you wanna draw attention to yourself is your extremely good performance, nothing else. Beside the fact that people don't like the whole training being published, there might be some other issues as well (security).The other advice is to spend more time with studying and less in front of the computer. Although the pass marks might be "only" 70%, but it's not enough if you control only 70% of your traffic safely. Always strive for the best performance, it'll impress your instructors and even if something goes wrong one day, they'll be more likely to give you a second chance.
Thank you, Viktor, for your reply. Looking back at it now, I have indeed spent far too much time on other stuff than my course, including this blog, which obviously did not help my professional progress in any way. I now realize this, and if I were to get through the military selection tests, I'll be sure to follow this invaluable advice.
- Viktor
To conclude this blog, it's very long overdue and I don't know if this will ever reach the respective people, but I've also come to realize that my blog has at times put some staff- and my class-members, both at Skyguide and EUROCONTROL, in a corner they'd rather not find themselves in. I am also aware now that the knowledge I (thought I) had before starting the course, often lead me to being too confident - and most likely arrogant, even - in my actions, and towards the instructors.
To this day, I still vividly remember some instances where I clearly overstepped and for that, I wish to apologize dearly to anyone I may in any way have offended, hurt or caused problems towards.
Kind regards,
Mathias Jacobs-Anseeuw